Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
80/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
NextSeq 500 whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of Oecobius (small spider genus) with 1.6 million reads, 482 Mb bases, and 93% Q20 (89% Q30) provides low-coverage draft-genome data for a non-model spider species with minimal prior genomic resources. The 35.5% GC and limited depth suit comparative-genomics and phylogenetic applications rather than complete assembly or detailed variant discovery.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0