Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
88/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
NextSeq 500 whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of Centruroides sculpturatus (Arizona bark scorpion) with 3.9 million reads, 1.18 Gb bases, and 92.9% Q20 (88.7% Q30) provides modest-coverage genome data for this venomous arachnid species with limited prior genomic resources. The 32.6% GC and moderate depth suit genome-assembly scaffolding and comparative genomics more than SNP genotyping or structural-variant discovery.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0