Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina HiSeq 2000 whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of Citrus medica (citron) with 38.2 million reads, 9.6 Gb bases, and 93.1% Q20 (88% Q30) provides moderate-quality genome data for this ancestral citrus species, enabling trait-associated marker discovery. The 37.4% GC and substantial read depth support SNP calling and identification of Citrus medica-specific genomic features relevant to citrus breeding and evolution.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0