← Dataset search
SRR4009203
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
52/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 1000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
9.8
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
2849981200
reported
total reads
14249906
reported
mean coverage
0.9
extrapolated
n content pct
0.069
measured
pct q20 bases
92.5
measured
pct q30 bases
87.4
measured
pct reads q30
86.4
measured
sampled bases
73028600
measured
sampled reads
730286
measured
gc content pct
42.3
measured
polyg tail pct
0
measured
read length sd
0
measured
quality dropoff
-4.3
measured
read length max
100
measured
read length min
100
measured
read length n50
100
measured
max base quality
41
measured
mean read length
100
measured
max n pct per pos
0.19
measured
mean base quality
34.5
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
0
measured
read length median
100
measured
adapter content pct
2.51
measured
median read quality
37.6
measured
duplication rate pct
15.23
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.02
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 52/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
0.9
extrapolated
×1.2
0%
pct q30 bases
87.4
measured
×1
87%
duplication rate pct
15.23
measured
×0.5
77%
adapter content pct
2.51
measured
×0.4
89%
QC cost
21 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0