← Dataset search
SRR4009222
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
16/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 1000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
8.54
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
17482040800
reported
total reads
87410204
reported
mean coverage
5.6
extrapolated
n content pct
0.125
measured
pct q20 bases
83.6
measured
pct q30 bases
74.1
measured
pct reads q30
69.9
measured
sampled bases
74755400
measured
sampled reads
747554
measured
gc content pct
46.3
measured
polyg tail pct
0
measured
read length sd
0
measured
quality dropoff
-8.2
measured
read length max
100
measured
read length min
100
measured
read length n50
100
measured
max base quality
41
measured
mean read length
100
measured
max n pct per pos
0.26
measured
mean base quality
30.3
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
0
measured
read length median
100
measured
adapter content pct
60.12
measured
median read quality
34.7
measured
duplication rate pct
21.51
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.04
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 16/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
5.6
extrapolated
×1.2
0%
pct q30 bases
74.1
measured
×1
21%
duplication rate pct
21.51
measured
×0.5
58%
adapter content pct
60.12
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
23 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0