← Dataset search
SRR4009232
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
58/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 1000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
11.64
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
1737461400
reported
total reads
17374614
reported
mean coverage
0.6
extrapolated
n content pct
0.016
measured
pct q20 bases
92.9
measured
pct q30 bases
87.7
measured
pct reads q30
86.5
measured
sampled bases
50000000
measured
sampled reads
1000000
measured
gc content pct
41
measured
polyg tail pct
0
measured
read length sd
0
measured
quality dropoff
0.4
measured
read length max
50
measured
read length min
50
measured
read length n50
50
measured
max base quality
41
measured
mean read length
50
measured
max n pct per pos
0.241
measured
mean base quality
34.9
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
100
measured
read length median
50
measured
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
median read quality
37.8
measured
duplication rate pct
3.5
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.01
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 58/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
0.6
extrapolated
×1.2
0%
pct q30 bases
87.7
measured
×1
89%
duplication rate pct
3.5
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
19 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0