Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2000 short-read RNA-seq of Apis mellifera (honeybee) with 25.4 million reads and 92.8% Q30 provides good-quality transcriptomics data for this model social insect, enabling behavior and physiology gene profiling across castes and conditions. The 42.9% GC and substantial read depth support sensitive detection of genes regulating social behavior, reproduction, and immune response in honey-bee colonies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0