Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
88/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina MiSeq whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of Salmonella enterica with 1.36 million reads, 597 Mb bases, and 90.3% Q20 (85.5% Q30) provides low-coverage bacterial genome data suitable for strain identification and phylogenetic placement. The 52.8% GC and modest depth enable draft-level assembly scaffolding and virulence-gene detection more than complete genome closure or fine-scale variant discovery in this pathogenic bacterium.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0