Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR403890

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

83/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

40-bp bulk-RNA-seq from Illumina Genome Analyzer II; grade B (83/100). Mean base quality (Phred=30) is limiting; low duplication (27.7%) provides good coverage independence. Acceptable for reuse, though Phred=30 may impact variant discrimination in low-complexity regions.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer II
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 764698520 reported
total reads 19117463 reported
n content pct 0.009 measured
pct q20 bases 100 measured
pct q30 bases 100 measured
gc content pct 46.6 measured
mean read length 40 measured
mean base quality 30 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 27.7 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 83/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 100 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 30 measured ×0.6 33%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 27.7 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 11 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 90