Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
39/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
High-depth bulk RNA-seq from Apis mellifera on an Illumina HiSeq 2500, producing 281 million short reads across 56.8 billion bases, though with lower Q30 coverage (60.3%). This exceptionally deep dataset, despite quality concerns at the read level, enables profiling of even low-abundance transcripts when aggregated appropriately.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0