Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Amplicon sequencing from soil metagenome on an Illumina MiSeq, producing 1.8 million short reads with moderate quality (45.8% Q30 bases) across 879 million bases. The elevated N-content (2.318%) and balanced GC composition (46.8%) are consistent with environmental amplicon data; enables microbial community profiling with standard filtering.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0