Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
90/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read bulk RNA-seq from Apis mellifera on an Illumina HiSeq 2500, yielding 23.6 million reads with excellent Q30 coverage (96.9%) across 5.9 billion bases. The minimal contamination (0.001% N-content) and moderate GC composition (40.9%) support high-confidence expression profiling in honeybees.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0