SRR4293758

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

99/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq (Bemisia tabaci). Grade A with excellent base quality (93.5% Q30, 35.4 mean) across ~17.5M reads. Duplication at 31.71% scored weakest (96/100) but remains acceptable for bulk RNA-seq, indicating manageable PCR amplification. Recommended for reuse with standard duplicate handling.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Bemisia tabaci

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 4374658750 reported

total reads 17498635 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 96.7 measured

pct q30 bases 93.5 measured

gc content pct 39.6 measured

mean read length 125 measured

mean base quality 35.4 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 31.71 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 99/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 93.5 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 35.4 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 31.71 measured ×0.4 96%

QC cost 24 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0