SRR4305063

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

48/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

human gut metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2508180176 reported

total reads 12726669 reported

n content pct 0.004 measured

pct q20 bases 85.3 measured

pct q30 bases 72.5 measured

gc content pct 44.6 measured

mean read length 96.1 measured

mean base quality 30.4 measured

adapter content pct 4.85 measured

duplication rate pct 5.83 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 48/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 72.5 measured ×1 13%

duplication rate pct 5.83 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 4.85 measured ×0.4 73%

QC cost 28 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0