Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
90/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq from Bemisia tabaci on an Illumina HiSeq 2500, yielding 12.3 million short reads with lower Q30 coverage (86.6%) across 1.2 billion bases. The elevated N-content (0.02%) and lower GC composition (37.2%) are noted; the dataset enables expression profiling in this whitefly pest with appropriate filtering.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0