Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
60/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Amplicon sequencing from Homo sapiens on an Illumina MiSeq, producing 4.4 million short reads with lower quality (78.1% Q30 bases) across 2.7 billion bases. The zero N-content and elevated GC composition (52.6%) are favorable for human amplicon studies, though moderate Q30 coverage requires filtering.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0