Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of water buffalo. Grade B (83/100) is driven by moderate Q30+ depth at 83.5%—adequate for SNP discovery but variants in lower-quality regions carry inflated error rates. Excellent low duplication (1.31%) and zero adapter content are positive signs of clean library quality, making this dataset suitable for variant calling with standard quality filtering.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0