Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of maize using Illumina Genome Analyzer II generates 4.4 billion bases across 29 million short reads, offering genomic variant discovery and assembly scaffolding for this polyploid crop. Quality metrics show 76% of bases above Q20 with moderate GC content (45.7%), suitable for SNP calling and structural variant detection in non-repetitive regions.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0