SRR5010607

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

38/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Long-read bulk RNA-seq; F grade driven catastrophically by adapter contamination (88.44%), rendering the majority of reads unreliable; suboptimal Q30 (77.3%) compounds the issue and makes this dataset unsuitable for most reuse.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Aedes albopictus

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 16699029704 reported

total reads 27739252 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 81.3 measured

pct q30 bases 77.3 measured

gc content pct 42.3 measured

mean read length 301 measured

mean base quality 30.4 measured

adapter content pct 88.44 measured

duplication rate pct 40.51 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 38/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 77.3 measured ×1 37%

mean base quality 30.4 measured ×0.6 40%

adapter content pct 88.44 measured ×0.4 0%

duplication rate pct 40.51 measured ×0.4 77%

QC cost 14 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0