SRR503414

ENA first seen 2012

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

17/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Conus geographus

Instrument

454 GS FLX Titanium

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 168367542 reported

total reads 238682 reported

n content pct 0.01 measured

pct q20 bases 27.2 measured

pct q30 bases 27.2 measured

gc content pct 43.1 measured

mean read length 466.9 measured

mean base quality 10.3 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 73.42 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 17/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 27.2 measured ×1 0%

mean base quality 10.3 measured ×0.6 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 73.42 measured ×0.4 4%

QC cost 6 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0