Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq from A. gambiae. Grade B (83/100) is held back primarily by high adapter contamination at 26.32%, which will bias downstream transcript quantification by interfering with read mapping and introducing expression fold-change artifacts. Base quality metrics are otherwise strong (97.5% Q30+, mean 37), indicating the sequencing itself was clean but library prep requires trimming before reuse.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0