← Dataset search
SRR5161719
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
92/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Brassica napus
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
5981550728
reported
total reads
19810984
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
99.9
measured
pct q30 bases
99.5
measured
gc content pct
34.9
measured
mean read length
150.9
measured
mean base quality
41.3
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
18.03
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 92/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
99.5
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
18.03
measured
×0.5
69%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
23 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0