← Dataset search
SRR5161773
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
91/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Brassica napus
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 3000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
7170179968
reported
total reads
23748526
reported
n content pct
0.006
measured
pct q20 bases
99.9
measured
pct q30 bases
99.5
measured
gc content pct
35.1
measured
mean read length
150.9
measured
mean base quality
41.3
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
19.53
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 91/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
99.5
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
19.53
measured
×0.5
64%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
21 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0