SRR5185026

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

89/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

HiSeq 2500 WGS of Bacillus cereus (1M reads, 415M bases, 37.4% GC, 98.9% ≥Q30) with excellent base quality supports genome assembly and variant detection. The high-quality data is suitable for clinical surveillance and virulence factor identification.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Bacillus cereus

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 415261343 reported

total reads 1042084 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 99.4 measured

pct q30 bases 98.9 measured

gc content pct 37.4 measured

mean read length 200 measured

mean base quality 39.2 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 20.89 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 89/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 98.9 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 20.89 measured ×0.5 60%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 23 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0