SRR5272490
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq (HiSeq 2000, Hymenophyllum caudiculatum, 101bp reads). B-grade (87/100) dataset with strong base quality (mean 34.4) but severely compromised by extreme PCR duplication of 57.26% (scored only 39/100). Longer reads aid splice-variant mapping, but duplication strongly limits abundance reliability. Reuse requires extensive duplicate removal.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.