Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2000 short-read RNA-seq of Anopheles sinensis (malaria vector mosquito) with 25.5 million reads and high Q30 94.9% (Q20 98.2%) provides excellent quality for vector transcriptomics and blood-feeding-response profiling in this Asian malaria vector. The 51.7% GC and deep read coverage enable detection of vector-competence genes and pathogen-interaction pathways relevant to disease transmission dynamics.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0