SRR5398945

ENA first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

29/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Homo sapiens capillary WGS with critically failing QC (29/100, grade F). Reading is provisional (evidence_strength=0.61): extrapolated mean_coverage metric combined with only 1 read spanning 556 bp yields zero meaningful genomic coverage; dataset is effectively empty and unsuitable for any reuse.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

AB 3730 Genetic Analyzer

Platform

CAPILLARY

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 556 reported

total reads 1 reported

mean coverage 0 extrapolated

n content pct 8.813 measured

pct q20 bases 64.4 measured

pct q30 bases 55.9 measured

gc content pct 44.1 measured

mean read length 556 measured

mean base quality 35 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 0 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 29/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 0 extrapolated ×1.2 0%

pct q30 bases 55.9 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 0 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 1 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0