Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina HiSeq 2500 whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of Homo sapiens with 196.5 million reads, 98.2 Gb bases, and 31.7× mean coverage provides high-quality human genomic data suitable for variant calling, copy-number detection, and structural-variant discovery. The 92.6% Q20 and 89.4% Q30 base quality support sensitive SNP/indel genotyping and medium-resolution genome analysis, though not sufficient for ultra-rare variant or base-modification detection.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0