Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR553576

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

84/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:opus

This is bulk human RNA-seq from an older Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx run, and it earns a solid B (84/100): base quality is the standout strength, with 93% of bases at Q30, a mean base quality of 35.4, and zero detectable adapter contamination, meaning reads are clean and trimming is essentially unnecessary. The one metric dragging the grade down is the 73.4% duplication rate, which scored just 4/100 and is the single most important caveat for reuse — although high duplication is partly expected in RNA-seq from highly expressed transcripts, a level this elevated points to limited library complexity that can bias expression quantification and inflate apparent coverage, so it warrants checking after deduplication before trusting low-abundance signal. The short 37 bp single-end reads also limit splice-junction and isoform-level resolution, making this dataset better suited to gene-level expression than to transcript assembly or allele-specific analysis. Note that evidence_strength is 1, but the headline counts (total reads and bases) are reported rather than measured, so those size figures should be treated as provisional pending a deeper measured pass, even though the core quality metrics here were directly measured.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 898559911 reported
total reads 24285403 reported
n content pct 0.002 measured
pct q20 bases 97.4 measured
pct q30 bases 93 measured
gc content pct 44.8 measured
mean read length 37 measured
mean base quality 35.4 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 73.41 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 84/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 93 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 35.4 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 73.41 measured ×0.4 4%
QC cost 11 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 89