Corpus 1,273 assessed · 1,174 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 169 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR5626538

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

High-depth whole-genome sequencing with perfect quality scores and minimal duplication (1.77%), ideal for comprehensive variant discovery and population genetics; near-zero N-content and high Q30 (95.5%) ensure reliable base accuracy.

Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Holacanthella duospinosa
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 19149047800 reported
total reads 95745239 reported
n content pct 0 measured
pct q20 bases 98.4 measured
pct q30 bases 95.5 measured
gc content pct 33.3 measured
mean read length 100 measured
mean base quality 36.9 measured
adapter content pct 0.12 measured
duplication rate pct 1.77 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.5 measured ×1 100%
duplication rate pct 1.77 measured ×0.5 100%
adapter content pct 0.12 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 23 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 72