← Dataset search
SRR5663769
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
28/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Zea mays
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
2104830996
reported
total reads
5235898
reported
mean coverage
0.9
extrapolated
n content pct
0.124
measured
pct q20 bases
86
measured
pct q30 bases
79
measured
gc content pct
46.3
measured
mean read length
201
measured
mean base quality
30.7
measured
adapter content pct
23.4
measured
duplication rate pct
13.42
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 28/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
0.9
extrapolated
×1.2
0%
pct q30 bases
79
measured
×1
45%
duplication rate pct
13.42
measured
×0.5
83%
adapter content pct
23.4
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
26 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0