← Dataset search
SRR5663775
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Zea mays
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
2364170760
reported
total reads
7828380
reported
mean coverage
1
extrapolated
n content pct
0.034
measured
pct q20 bases
93
measured
pct q30 bases
86.8
measured
gc content pct
47.3
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
34
measured
adapter content pct
11.15
measured
duplication rate pct
7.69
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 47/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
1
extrapolated
×1.2
0%
pct q30 bases
86.8
measured
×1
84%
duplication rate pct
7.69
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
11.15
measured
×0.4
28%
QC cost
28 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0