← Dataset search
SRR5663845
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
49/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Zea mays
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
2387922758
reported
total reads
7907029
reported
mean coverage
1
extrapolated
n content pct
0.016
measured
pct q20 bases
95.5
measured
pct q30 bases
91
measured
gc content pct
48.4
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
35.2
measured
adapter content pct
10.52
measured
duplication rate pct
14.44
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 49/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
1
extrapolated
×1.2
0%
pct q30 bases
91
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
14.44
measured
×0.5
80%
adapter content pct
10.52
measured
×0.4
32%
QC cost
37 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0