← Dataset search
SRR5665011
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
55/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
gut metagenome
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
629406036
reported
total reads
2529553
reported
n content pct
0.094
measured
pct q20 bases
90.7
measured
pct q30 bases
82.6
measured
gc content pct
44.8
measured
mean read length
121.7
measured
mean base quality
34.1
measured
adapter content pct
37.54
measured
duplication rate pct
13.11
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 55/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
82.6
measured
×1
63%
duplication rate pct
13.11
measured
×0.5
84%
adapter content pct
37.54
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
1 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0