SRR5665089

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

51/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

gut metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 4000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 106549255 reported

total reads 428168 reported

n content pct 0.062 measured

pct q20 bases 93.4 measured

pct q30 bases 87.7 measured

gc content pct 40.6 measured

mean read length 123 measured

mean base quality 35.1 measured

adapter content pct 30.85 measured

duplication rate pct 35.14 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 51/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 87.7 measured ×1 89%

duplication rate pct 35.14 measured ×0.5 15%

adapter content pct 30.85 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 1 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0