← Dataset search
SRR5665124
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
49/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
gut metagenome
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
485919264
reported
total reads
1960616
reported
n content pct
0.065
measured
pct q20 bases
94
measured
pct q30 bases
88.1
measured
gc content pct
42.1
measured
mean read length
121.6
measured
mean base quality
35.2
measured
adapter content pct
43.48
measured
duplication rate pct
38.36
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 49/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
88.1
measured
×1
91%
duplication rate pct
38.36
measured
×0.5
5%
adapter content pct
43.48
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
1 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0