← Dataset search
SRR5748818
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
insufficient data to scoreStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
methylation
Organism
Sorghum bicolor
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
8.58
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
24805898000
reported
total reads
99223592
reported
n content pct
0.064
measured
pct q20 bases
95.2
measured
pct q30 bases
91.1
measured
pct reads q30
92.9
measured
sampled bases
78410625
measured
sampled reads
627285
measured
gc content pct
29.4
measured
polyg tail pct
0.01
measured
read length sd
0
measured
quality dropoff
-1.3
measured
read length max
125
measured
read length min
125
measured
read length n50
125
measured
max base quality
38
measured
mean read length
125
measured
max n pct per pos
0.177
measured
mean base quality
35.7
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
0
measured
read length median
125
measured
adapter content pct
0.21
measured
median read quality
37.2
measured
duplication rate pct
3.85
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.11
measured
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
91.1
measured
×1
100%
QC cost
22 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0