← Dataset search
SRR5748819
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
insufficient data to scoreStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
methylation
Organism
Sorghum bicolor
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
8.16
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
31593490200
reported
total reads
105311634
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
95.9
measured
pct q30 bases
90.2
measured
pct reads q30
97
measured
sampled bases
85852050
measured
sampled reads
572347
measured
gc content pct
29.2
measured
polyg tail pct
0.01
measured
read length sd
0
measured
quality dropoff
-1.7
measured
read length max
150
measured
read length min
150
measured
read length n50
150
measured
max base quality
42
measured
mean read length
150
measured
max n pct per pos
0
measured
mean base quality
37.9
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
0
measured
read length median
150
measured
adapter content pct
0.2
measured
median read quality
38.8
measured
duplication rate pct
12.02
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.05
measured
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
90.2
measured
×1
100%
QC cost
16 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0