SRR5788244

ENA first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

78/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Second marine metagenomic sample on NextSeq 550 with 12.0 million short reads and good quality (93% ≥Q20, 89.7% ≥Q30). The smaller read count may limit species detection but supports focused ocean microbiota characterization.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

marine metagenome

Instrument

NextSeq 550

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 3597291000 reported

total reads 11990970 reported

n content pct 0.003 measured

pct q20 bases 93 measured

pct q30 bases 89.7 measured

gc content pct 48.7 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 33.6 measured

adapter content pct 24.59 measured

duplication rate pct 1.47 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 78/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.7 measured ×1 99%

duplication rate pct 1.47 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 24.59 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 24 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0