Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR5803174

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Whole genome sequencing (goat). Grade A quality (100/100) with exceptional measured metrics. Duplication at only 1.46% is exceptionally low for WGS, indicating proper coverage depth without over-amplification; Q30 of 94.1% is clean. Highly reusable for genomic analysis.

Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Capra hircus
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 43612954808 reported
total reads 223958523 reported
n content pct 0.001 measured
pct q20 bases 98.9 measured
pct q30 bases 94.1 measured
gc content pct 43.2 measured
mean read length 97.4 measured
mean base quality 36.7 measured
adapter content pct 0.12 measured
duplication rate pct 1.46 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.1 measured ×1 100%
duplication rate pct 1.46 measured ×0.5 100%
adapter content pct 0.12 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 7 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 89