Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
90/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina HiSeq 2000 short-read RNA-seq from Apis mellifera (honeybee) with 8.6M reads and 98.1% Q20 bases indicating excellent base accuracy with zero N content. The 32.7% GC content is characteristic of hymenopteran genomes and the dataset supports gene expression profiling of honeybee tissues or developmental stages. Quality metrics favor reliable mapping to the reference genome for quantifying transcript abundance in studies of social insect biology.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0