SRR585781

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

62/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Human gut microbial community profiling via WGS on HiSeq 2000 generated 14.2 million short reads with moderate quality (85% ≥Q20, 76.1% ≥Q30). The microbiome approach and lower accuracy reflect complex community templates in this ecological sample.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

human gut metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2868209918 reported

total reads 14199059 reported

n content pct 0.008 measured

pct q20 bases 85 measured

pct q30 bases 76.1 measured

gc content pct 42.8 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 30.8 measured

adapter content pct 1.98 measured

duplication rate pct 0.76 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 62/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 76.1 measured ×1 31%

duplication rate pct 0.76 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 1.98 measured ×0.4 93%

QC cost 33 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0