SRR587543

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

61/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Human genome sequencing on HiSeq 2000 generated only 2.1 million short reads with good quality (93.9% ≥Q20). The minimal depth and sparse mammalian coverage preclude useful assembly or comprehensive variant detection.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 422991232 reported

total reads 2094016 reported

mean coverage 0.1 extrapolated

n content pct 0.012 measured

pct q20 bases 93.9 measured

pct q30 bases 93.9 measured

gc content pct 40 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 28.4 measured

adapter content pct 0.42 measured

duplication rate pct 0.87 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 61/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 0.1 extrapolated ×1.2 0%

pct q30 bases 93.9 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 0.87 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.42 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 46 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0