← Dataset search
SRR5908326
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
50/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WES
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
18918732200
reported
total reads
95082505
reported
n content pct
0.067
measured
pct q20 bases
79.5
measured
pct q30 bases
66.2
measured
gc content pct
42.7
measured
mean read length
100
measured
mean base quality
31.6
measured
adapter content pct
2.28
measured
duplication rate pct
56
measured
mean target coverage
305.1
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 50/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean target coverage
305.1
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
66.2
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
56
measured
×0.5
0%
adapter content pct
2.28
measured
×0.4
91%
QC cost
22 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0