Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
66/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
miRNA-Seq library from Aedes aegypti (dengue/Zika vector mosquito) on HiSeq 2500 with 11.9M reads and 82.5% Q30 bases, representing the expected lower quality for small RNA sequencing due to shorter insert sizes. The 48.4% GC and ~60nt median insert length enable microRNA discovery and abundance quantification in mosquito tissues. Appropriate for identifying developmentally regulated miRNAs or examining immune-responsive small RNAs in a medically important dipteran host.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0