Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq from alfalfa leafcutter bee (Megachile rotundata) on HiSeq 2000 with 4.6M reads and solid 97.8% Q20, 92.9% Q30 supporting gene expression profiling of solitary bee pollinators. The 935M bases and 40.5% GC enable comparative studies between solitary and social hymenopterans and annotation of bee-specific transcripts. Reusable for investigating foraging ecology, nest-building behavior, and reproductive physiology distinct from social bee models.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0