Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
81/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome short-read sequencing of Populus alba var. pyramidalis (Lombardy poplar) using HiSeq 2500 with 65.5M reads and 16.4B bases enabling genome assembly and variant detection in this deciduous tree. The 36.9% GC and 90.8% Q20 support nucleotide-level variant calling and heterozygosity mapping in woody perennials. Reusable for comparative genomics of poplar clones, marker development, or studying structural variation in clonal propagation.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0