Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
70/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
miRNA-Seq from Anopheles sinensis (Asian malaria vector) using HiSeq 2500 with 30.7M reads and exceptional 98.7% Q20, 97.5% Q30 enabling comprehensive small-RNA profiling of a medically important vector species. The 1.54B bases and 53% GC support discovery of developmentally-regulated and infection-responsive microRNAs in Anopheles. Reusable for comparative studies of miRNA control of vector competence and innate immunity across malaria mosquito species.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0