SRR6189090
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
34/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
PacBio chicken WGS with zero Illumina-style quality scores (Q20/Q30 both 0%, characteristic of raw long-read output) and critically low extrapolated coverage (11×). Not reusable without substantial re-sequencing. Evidence is provisional.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.