Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR6193063

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

87/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Moderate-depth WGS of Salmonella enterica. Grade B, 87/100 with all metrics measured. High duplication (23.5%) is the primary limitation—it undermines rare variant confidence and requires rigorous duplicate removal preprocessing. Exceptional Q30 bases (97.3%) and zero adapter contamination indicate good chemistry, making this reusable for SNP discovery with strict deduplication.

Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Adjame
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 260414084 reported
total reads 1304542 reported
n content pct 0.003 measured
pct q20 bases 98.6 measured
pct q30 bases 97.3 measured
gc content pct 52.2 measured
mean read length 99.8 measured
mean base quality 38.5 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 23.48 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 87/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 97.3 measured ×1 100%
duplication rate pct 23.48 measured ×0.5 52%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 100